The Next President of the United States Will Be...

Get  ready for the first president from the Big Sky State, Brian Schweitzer. Huh?  Who's Brian Schweitzer?  

Keep reading...

He's the wildly-popular, Democratic former governor of Montana.  Learn more about Brian Schweitzer. Learn what Brian Schweitzer is thinking. 

But what about Hillary, I hear you cry? 

Why, have you forgotten that she voted for George W. Bush's illegal, $3 trillion bombardement, invasion and occupation of Iraq. [By the way, then Senator Barack Obama voted against the Iraq War, along with 20 other Democrats in the Senate.]

I'm sure Hillary would like to purge that item from her résumé, but Brian Schweitzer, for one, will never let her--or the American people--forget it. As he put it in Iowa [yes, Iowa...already Iowa] on December 18, 2013:

“When we were attacked at 9/11 by 17 Saudis and two Egyptians who called themselves Al-Qaeda, who weren’t welcome in Iraq, and George Bush got a bunch of Democrats to go to that war, I was just shaking my head in Montana.”

Furthermore, sharing a bed with a president and having the stamps from 112 countries in your passport cannot be considered serious qualifications for the presidency of United States of America.

It's likely that Hillary herself knows she's totally incompetent and unfit to be president and that's why she's so hesitant about tossing her hat in the ring.  Every time somebody asks her about running, she pussyfoots.

But the media pressure on Hillary Clinton to run is perhaps overwhelming and she may succumb to the adulation of the incestuous Washington insider crowd and the media, who decided she would be president the day she took the oath of office as the junior senator from New York on January 3, 2001. 

If the Democrats are bedazzled enough to nominate Hillary, the Republicans can run a yellow dog for president and win by a landslide. 

So, here is the Jagor prediction for the presidential election of 2016: it will be a race between two governors.

• The Democrats will reject their media darling Hillary Clinton and pick Brian Schweitzer;
• The Republicans will nominate Susana Martinez, the wildly popular [formerly Democratic] governor of New Mexico and reject their weight-challenged media darling Chris Christie and offer him a lifetime membership in WeightWatchers as a consolation prize.

Learn more about Susana Martinez.

Coincidentally, both Schweitzer and Martinez are Catholics, but Schweitzer's name means that a lot of Jews might mistake him for one of their own and vote for him by mistake. But that's OK, too.  Every vote counts.

Brian Schweitzer will win the election. You heard it here first..

Revised Dec. 24, 2013

US Mainstream Media silences dissent on Syria WMD claim

Just as George W. Bush and Dick Cheney and Colin Power and the rest of the rogue's gallery of war criminals lied about Saddam Hussain's nonexistent "weapons of mass destruction," in order to bombard, invade and occupy Iraq in 2003, Obama and his surrogates cherry-picked the data and lied about the Syrian sarin gas attack in order to bombard Syria, just a decade later, in 2013.

 

Just as in 2003, the mainstream media in 2013 drank the poisonous Kool-Aid and diffused Obama's lie without ever bothering to question it for a second.

And, as he has done so many times in the past, investigative journalist and historian Seymour Hersh found out the truth and wanted to tell it, but the American mainstream media were too scared to publish it:  both the Washington Post and The New Yorker turned Hersh down, so the article, Whose Sarin?, was finally published by the London Review of Books in its issue of December 19, 2013.

Unlike the warmongers' networks, however, RT-America, never fell for the lie and consistently reported that there was no proof that the Assad regime was responsible, reporting–correctly–that a Syrian opposition group, Al-Nusra, was capable of producing and delivering the gas. Watch the video Seymour Hersh: Mainstream Media Scared To Publish Syria Story [3:52].

 

Of course, we can understand the Post's reluctance, since the Washington Post ran an unsigned editorial on page A36 entitled "Irrefutable" on February 6, 2003, the day after Colin Powell's Iraq presentation to the U. N. Security Council.

But don't bother to look for it on the archives of the Washington Post website: the cowardly hyprocrites deleted it!

Read the censored Washington Post editorial, "Irrefutable" here and keep it in mind the next time a president lies to the nation and to the world in order to launch another war.